As a human species, we’ve reached an evolutionary threshold that calls for a profound recalibration of how we perceive and understand life — urging us to move beyond the fragmented lens through which we’ve viewed existence until now.
One of the fundamental aspects of this shift is how we relate to the body and to health.
We don’t just need narrower medical specialties or increasingly sophisticated treatment technologies — we need a new way of understanding physiology, pathophysiology, and psychology, in dialogue with the latest discoveries in genetics, molecular biology, bioinformatics, and neuroscience.
It is inefficient to treat a symptom, a disease, or an organ in isolation.
True success in optimizing health lies in understanding and treating the unified system called the human body.
This requires knowing the “particular terrain” of each individual — a terrain governed by an extremely complex mechanism known as metabolism.
Metabolism, defined as the sum of all biochemical processes, is what distinguishes a living organism from one devoid of life.
Life ceases when metabolic mechanisms reach a state of absolute equilibrium at the cellular level — that is, death.
The metabolic orchestra has its concertmaster: the endocrine system — due to its omnipresence, constancy, and self-regulating abilities.
No other morphological structure demonstrates these three integrated and synchronized roles.It performs two acts — catabolism and anabolism — in four registers: the corticotropic, gonadotropic, thyrotropic, and somatotropic axes, which together sustain the living melodic lines of metabolism.
From the conductor’s podium, describing the orchestra of the organism becomes extremely challenging — practically a nonlinear differential equation, with a harmonic complexity that demands years of study, observational finesse, and diverse clinical experience to grasp its uniqueness in every individual.
Yet the brain, as conductor, through its long phylogenetic evolution, masterfully integrates the neuroendocrine relationship between the autonomic nervous system and the endocrine system, ensuring the coherence, balance, and expressiveness of the human ensemble.
Moreover, between physiology and psychology, there is no real distance — only a functional interdependence.
Physiological imbalances directly influence mental functioning, and understanding biological dysfunctions provides precise insights into cognitive and emotional mechanisms.
That’s why the mind itself deserves to be understood in a new light.
It is not an abstract construct; it is to the brain what breathing is to the lungs or digestion is to the gastrointestinal system — the living expression of its functioning.
We can see it as an emergent phenomenon, arising from the interaction between the nervous system and the body’s internal and external environments.It’s worth exploring physiology in depth — to arrive at a deeper understanding of the mind.
I’m fascinated by interpreting physiological biomarkers through ratios and mathematical coefficients to verify mental patterns and the personal narrative of the person seeking my help.In this way, both client and therapist discover how the system we’re addressing truly operates, in all its closeness and complexity.
Thus, by combining principles from general systems theory, biology, and modern medical science, I believe we can begin to outline a new, integrative vision (I don’t yet know its name — only its structure), in which health is not the absence of disease, but the expression of systemic harmony — a hybrid path between science and wisdom, leading toward the optimization of life.
That’s what I tried to explain to my dear friend Simina. She challenged me to translate what I do for “normal people” — to give scientific words a clear and accessible life.
I wish everyone had friends like her. Beyond the fact that we can talk about almost anything — given enough time — my connection with her enriches me deeply. With her strategist’s spirit, she pushes me with questions, urging me to step out of technical language, to simplify what seems complicated, and to bring it to life — for all of us.
I don’t always succeed, but I keep trying.
Because, after all, science isn’t just for knowledge — it’s for people.It exists to bring more clarity and meaning into our lives.
Comments